USA: +1 508 290 1604 
Sign in
Using SCRUM, Lean Software Development, and DSDM
Dynamic Systems Development Model (DSDM) is a full project agile and robust technique or framework for task delivery that offers rigor, governance, flexibility, and agility to different organizations according to their demands (Ghani et al., 2015). On the contrary, SCRUM is a framework expertly developed to quickly offer a momentous value throughout the implementation of a particular project. Usually, the model is all-inclusive and flexible towards the process of developing products, and it always ensures that the development team collaborates and jointly functions to achieve the set objectives (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2017). Besides, this approach advances iterative and databased decision-making and emphasizes customer satisfaction by offering products in shippable augments. Similarly, Lean Software Development (LSD) is a responsive outline built on eliminating waste, enhancing resources and development time, and eventually conveying what is needed for a particular product (Kišš & Rossi, 2018). Organizations should incorporate different frameworks, such as DSDM, SCRUM, and LSD, into their activities and procedures to attain effective project management and agile development.
Planning and Execution of Projects
SCRUM
The implementation of projects in SCRUM follows the Agile Manifesto that focuses on specific products and people. SCRUM emphasizes collaboration with customers over negotiations for contracts. Similarly, it stresses developing and implementing working software instead of comprehensive documentation (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2017). SCRUM plans projects by considering techniques that allow interactions and individuals over the use of tools and multiple processes. The most compelling manner in SCRUM implementation involves effective response to different organizational changes instead of applying a resolute plan. Consequently, the planning and execution of projects in SCRUM encompass making appropriate and valuable choices that forgo one element to implement the best alternative (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2017). Moreover, the establishment of the project scope is done on an incremental basis, and it involves subdividing the project work into multiple user stories. The framework is also essential in the execution of projects because it employs best practices approaches that have developed the experience of several teams that utilize it (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2017). SCRUM helps in the execution and planning of projects by considering components such as timeline, scope, and project teams in all cases.
DSDM
Essentially, DSDM backs the active involvement of users during the life cycle of a project. The process of planning begins with strategy agreement, whereby it requires choosing between solution quality assurance and incremental delivery. The latter factors aspects such as time boxes and increments, while the former considers the integration of different activities, including testing and review into development. During this feasibility phase, the type of planning processes to implement is determined, the time for making commitments and agreements is selected, the approaches for assessing plans and progress are considered, and the determination of implementing plan changes using Agile technique are developed (Ghani et al., 2015). The framework utilizes different concepts of best practice in planning projects, testing their viability, tracking progress, and demonstrating control and other ways of incorporating project elements with the project framework. Therefore, DSDM focuses on incremental delivery and strategic goals of the benefits of real business while monitoring cost, time, quality, and risk.
Lean Software Development
This framework is common for projects that aim to optimize resources and the development period, in addition to waste elimination. Similarly, during planning, it focuses on obtaining only the main requirements of the product. The preparation of projects under LSD utilizes principles such as augmenting knowledge, delivering fast, eliminating waste, delaying commitment, building quality in, optimizing an entire project, and respecting people (Kišš & Rossi, 2018). LSD uses tools such as inventory management, value stream mapping, and Kanban to fulfill these principles (Kišš & Rossi, 2018). Therefore, LSD is a framework that targets obtaining results by improving the time consumed in a particular project while eliminating potential wastes.
Benefits and Trade-offs
Scrum
Scrum offers multifaceted advantages. Some of the prominent ones include more control, better product quality, low risks, faster return on investment, and enhanced customer satisfaction, and they emanate mainly from the process of a project. The framework enables organizations to monitor their stakeholders and customers during sprint review to attain a better quality for their products (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2017). Besides, the approach allows institutions to deliver quality products to customers and facilitate short duration usage by hastening the return on investment. Moreover, scrum allows organizations to easily manage their projects through timeboxing that empowers everyone about what should be done in a particular project (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2017). The control allows routine team collaboration and communication, which reduces uncertainties in a project. Scrum ensures customer satisfaction and value addition to businesses through short-time delivery of real value.
Scrum has four vital trade-offs. Interactions and individuals over tools and processes are the first noticeable ones. Similarly, ensuring collaboration of customers over negotiations involving contracts is challenging (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2017). Implementing a working software over wide-ranging documentation is another upside in the Agile Manifesto. Lastly, the approach prefers reacting to various changes instead of pursuing plans. Regardless of these shortcomings, the technique is robust.
DSDM
This approach allows project managers to implement projects and functions through prioritization. It enables timely delivery while maintaining the quality of the product being conveyed. Similarly, it enhances the possibility of a smooth deployment of various project procedures due to the active collaboration and teamwork by all concerned parties throughout implementation (Ghani et al., 2015). DSDM increases the chances of the final solution meeting the needs of a business, and it subsequently reduces the threats of formulating wrong solutions. Concentrating on the wants of the company, collaboration, and timely delivery and ensuring quality are the primary trade-offs in DSDM. Nonetheless, it still remains a successful method.
LSD
Increasing the participation rate of a team is the main benefit of this model. Essentially, people are critical components of the lean development approach. Secondly, the methodology averts any anticipated losses related to overproduction to manage additional functionality. Lastly, LSD simplifies and rationalizes the process of development by eliminating preventable phases in software designing (Kišš & Rossi, 2018). Besides, this benefit helps improve the development process by making it faster and cheaper. Similarly, optimizing a whole venture, eliminating waste, ensuring fast delivery, and creating knowledge are the LSD trade-offs that guide software development.
Obstacles
Scrum
Change resistance is a significant challenge in the implementation of this framework. It is difficult to change or shift the mindset of various teams and organizations into a new idea. Secondly, distributed teams are rather difficult. A broader perception asserts that scrum teams that are co-located are suitable for effective communication and output delivery compared to a dispersed team because this approach allows members of units to be in different locations (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2017). Bridging time variance among team members in different areas is another challenge because of the possibility of overlapping hours. Therefore, the situation demands abilities for desktop sharing, video conferencing facilities, and software for instant messaging.
DSDM
Utilizing the DSDM methodology poses some hurdles. Some of them include having volatile assets in a team, and the necessities of the project may not always be distributed. Besides, it lacks a full convolution of business representation and miscues conferences (Ghani et al., 2015). Having a set of complete conditions about the requirements of the progress of the system is a significant drawback.
LSD
Using LSD possess some possible risks. For instance, private ventures can incline towards less involving refinements. It requires knowing the impact of fused changes to determine the extent of facilitating implementations (Kišš & Rossi, 2018). Generation throughput may diminish because of support crises, and some requirements hindering the attainment of an organization just in time planning threatens the entire framework. Such drawbacks harden the adjustment of mistakes involving framework waste.
Strategies
Scrum
These fundamental actions can be implemented to eradicate any potential challenges or risks in the implementation of a project. A project manager can slowly incorporate scrum into the functions of various teams to minimize change resistance (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2017). Similarly, a manager ensures there is effective delivery of output and communication among different groups by ensuring collaboration even among distributed teams. The manager should develop approaches that aim at reducing the time difference between teams in different locations.
DSDM
Tackling challenges involving this approach requires the project manager to ensure that an organization has fixed assets. This strategy ensures that teams do not use temporary assets to allow the distribution of teams. Moreover, a manager should ensure that the groups represent all business functions to avoid conference mistakes (Ghani et al., 2015). Lastly, he or she should provide flexibility to prevent sticking to specific conditions in the operations of an organization.
LSD
A manager should implement a strategy that necessitates more involving projects to attain improvements. This strategy can help them to make appropriate decisions regarding prioritization of projects (Kišš & Rossi, 2018). Further, structures to supporting the teams and organizations are necessary for curbing support crises. Lastly, as a human resource manager, adequate planning for just in time should be essential to enable easy adjustment.
Conclusion
Overall, Scrum, Lean Software Development, and DSDM frameworks prominently influence the execution and planning of various projects. However, despite their benefits and extensive utilization, these models also face different obstacles during implementation. For instance, it is difficult to change the mindset of various teams and organizations into accepting a new idea in Scrum model. Nevertheless, the execution can be successful if a project manager implements appropriate strategies. Therefore, organizations need to incorporate effective frameworks into their operations and teams.
References
Ghani, I. M. R. A. N., Niknejad, N. A. G. H. M. E. H., Bello, M. A. N. N. I. R., Chughtai, M. W., & Jeong, S. R. (2015). Secure Dynamic System Development Method (Sdsdm): A Survey About Its Suitability. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 74(1), 4.
Kišš, F., & Rossi, B. (2018). Agile to lean software development transformation: A systematic literature review. In 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS) (pp. 969-973). IEEE.
Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2017). The scrum guide: The definitive guide to scrum: The rules of the game, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2017/2017-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf
